The Problem with Logical Fallacies and why it doesn’t Really Matter
Anyway
“The
problem with logical fallacies as a proof in philosophy is that they can be
proven wrong by the Inconceivable Theory,” K-Dog starts.
“The
what?” G-Money asks, sitting on the other side of the table from K-Dog.
“It’s
a theory I just made up, look, don’t question it, just listen. It is said in philosophy that the impossible
is only known by that which is unimaginable, or, that which is impossible
cannot be imagined.”
“Right,”
G-Money got this part, simple philosophical structure.
“So
a baby picking up a car is possible in philosophy even though it seems
impossible in real life. This difference
lets us decide how and what to discuss within philosophy. God could exist because we can imagine a big
bearded man up in the clouds and true love could exist because it is imaginable
that two people are perfect for each other.
Even if you don’t believe these things they are possible, despite
whatever logical proofs you come up with.”
“Despite
any proofs? What’s that supposed to
mean? I mean, if I had a real strong
argument with some logical evidence and a sound conclusion then I’d prove God
doesn’t exist.”
K-Dog
just stared at him blankly for a while before continuing in a well-mannered way
which clearly told G-Money to shut his trap.
“Wrong. You would have a valid
and possibly sound argument (depending on some serious looking over) that God
could not exist. “Real strong” doesn’t
count for shit here, it as to be absolute, and honestly I can’t even begin to
fathom how you would come up with an argument without any measure of doubt
would prove God does not exist anymore than anyone could prove God does. We can only make extremely likely.”
“Fine,
alright. So I can make pretty damn sure
it’s true but you never know if some nutcase is going to believe whatever he or
she wants.”
K-Dog’s
hand went to his forehead, where it rested, and waited for K-Dog to gain the
courage to continue. “The thing about
philosophy G-Money, is that we don’t want possibilities. Proof without doubt is what we are really
after. So anyway, if you’d be so kind to
stop blurting out, my point was that one cannot achieve proof without doubt
within an argument as long as the other side is imaginable, like God, true
love, and babies lifting cars. So what
does that leave us? Well, now we have
logical truths.”
“Those
are square circles and married bachelors, right?” G-Money asks.
“That’s
right. One cannot be married and a
bachelor at the same time. The two
meanings of the two words are directly opposing each other. One cannot exist while the other exist. Circles cannot be square else they would be
square not circle and chickens cannot be eggs else they would be eggs not
chickens. This is when logical fallacies
come into play. Logical fallacies are
the best way to prove and opposing argument wrong because they are unimaginable
and thusly impossible. If you can prove
something impossible that someone is arguing they really can’t go on arguing it
without sounding stupid.”
“But
you said there is a problem with logical fallacies.”
“Right
on, I did. My new theory, or perhaps old
theory by a new name, what-have-you, the Inconceivable Theory.”
“Where’d
you come up with this swinger?”
“Made
it up after seeing a couple of rats of unusual size as a matter of fact. Now hush you.
I’m going to start with a thought experiment to prove my theory. Look now, imagine infinity.”
“Got
it.”
“What
are you imagining?”
“Infinity,
you just told me—“
“What
specifically, G-Money!”
“Oh,
um, numbers flying up towards an infinite amount of other numbers.”
“Right. So you know what infinity is at least, I was
worried. But look, I want to put forward
that you are not imagining infinity.”
“Whatcha
mean I’m no—“
“Shut
it and listen. Look, infinity is not one
number after another spinning through your head, infinity is all the numbers
all at once which in mathematical theory (or proof, what-have-you) continues
forever. You are only imagining set
values on your way to infinity. No one
number can be imagined which is infinity, because infinity is all the numbers,
going and going and going forever. You
can’t put it in your head. You may
understand the concept and how it works, we may even be able to measure
infinity (did you know, for instance, there is more infinity between one and
two due to decimal points then there is between 1 and forever (if counting on
whole digits)), but you cannot envision what infinity is because infinity is
really only a concept and not a physical thing.”
“This
seems a little sketchy K-Dog.”
“Take
it or leave it G-Money, but unless you can show me how to imagine the
everything, this makes sense.”
“What
about mirrors? Two mirrors facing each
other, that’s infinity.”
“Well,
I can prove that wrong real quick. First
off your vision, when looking down the infinite mirror world eventually cuts
out into a point and so you aren’t seeing an infinite number of images. And secondly your eyes work just like your
mind does, they can only focus on one point at a time. You can’t look at a cup and an orange at the
same time and comprehend both, at least not in the same way (This I say,
realizing there are experiments on sounds and sights talking about just this). So really you are once again seeing points
along the way to infinity but not all of infinity at once.”
“Okay,
fine, but so what?”
“Don’t
you see? If you can’t imagine infinity
it is impossible in philosophy and yet here we are in this universe where
mathematically it has been proven infinity exists. The unimaginable exists my friend, that’s
what I’m getting at.”
“It’s
so it’s inconceivable… yeah I get it.”
“Course
you do, you’re smart G-Money. But look,
this doesn’t end with infinity or that unimaginable things can exist. God is omnipotent, right? All-powerful and the like? And it is generally accepted that God must
work in the realm of possible, of logical.
He can’t go making burritos so hot he can’t eat them or married
bachelors because they are logically impossible. Except…?
Go ahead…?”
“Except
that now impossibilities could be possible and we just can’t conceive them.”
“Right
on me boy. The Inconceivable
Theory. That which is unimaginable is
possibly possible and we just can’t even begin to comprehend what it is.”
“So why
doesn’t it matter anyway?”
“What’s
that?”
“In the
title you said, “and why it doesn’t Really Matter Anyway.” I mean, you’ve gotten us in a pit of
skepticism where everything could be or could not be possible. Even Descartes “I think therefore I am” could
be up for grabs. You’re worse than
Hume…”
“Ah,
well, look, first off that’s not exactly what Descartes said, and secondly,
philosophers have a tendency, I think, to whisk away the inconceivable because
if we can’t comprehend something we can’t begin to talk about it and it doesn’t
actually matter. But I call bullshit on
that. We can’t know anything for sure, I
mean the world could be a carrot and brains could be in vats, and we have to
realize that to move forward. It does
not good just pretending that this line of thinking is illogical, we have to try to figure it out. Try is a very underappreciated word in
philosophy I think. And you know what,
our hands are in front of us either way and whether I’m hallucinating or
bullshitting, our hands are all we’ve really got to keep us here. Mid as well keep on truckin’ and trying to
figure stuff out.”
“You
know I hate you right?”
“Aw,
yeah I do!”
No comments:
Post a Comment